FathersVia Patrum

A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §8

Prefatio: Why the three Crimina are cited — not to litigate, but to show the necessity of one defense

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

IV.

Thus far I have brought forward the three most atrocious Accusations forged against me by the council of my Adversaries, collected from three Lutheran Doctors (those Orthodox ones, of course, who cannot err), framed in their own words. Not, to be sure, with a mind either to litigate with them about these things and proceed to empty or impious quarrels, or even to try to excuse myself before those most rigid Judges of mine after the sentence already passed against me by them (for that would be nothing else than imprudently and incautiously to provoke a heavier sentence against myself); but partly so that it may become known to a benevolent Reader, free from prejudices and passions, how hostilely they have invaded me, and with what atrocity — never having been injured by me — two of them, not even known to me by name before, have tried to tear the fame of a most innocent neighbor and to divert onto me the just indignation of the whole Lutheran Church (which, as holding directly and entirely the Foundation of the whole Christian Faith, I have always held ought to be pursued with fraternal charity), if what they said were true; partly so that I might show that I did not snatch at an occasion, but that the hardest necessity of snatching it was imposed on me — once only, and never hereafter — of alleging my Deeds and Words and of laying them before everyone's eyes, from which my adversaries have blushed at no one in sucking so much venom against me.

Latin

IV. Adductae hactenus a me sunt Adversariorum meorum ex tribus numero Doctoribus Theologis Lutheranis (Orthodoxis scil. illis et errare nesciis) collecti Concilii, atrocissimae adversus me confictae Tres Accusationes, propriis eorum verbis conceptae; Non eo certe animo, quasi vel de his litigare cum iisdem, et ad rixas inanes aut impias, procedere, vel saltem me illis, rigidissimis meis Judicibus, post jam tum latam ab iis adversus me sententiam, exculpare tentem (hoc enim nil aliud foret, quam graviorem sententiam adversus me, imprudenter et incaute provocare); sed partim, ut benevolo, eidemque a praejudiciis et affectibus libero Lectori innotescat, quam hostiliter isti me invaserint, quantaque atrocitate, nunquam a me laesi, quin duo eorum, ne nominibus quidem antehac mihi cogniti, famam innocentissimi proximi lacerare, et universae Ecclesiae Lutheranae (quam, utpote totius Christianae Fidei Fundamentum Directe omnino tenacem, Fraterna semper charitate prosequendam duxi) justam, si vera dixissent, indignationem in me derivare annisi sint: partim, ut ansam non arriperem, sed durissimam istam arripiendi necessitatem mihi impositam ostenderem, semel duntaxat, nec posthac unquam, tam Facta quam Verba mea allegandi omniumque oculis exponendi, ex quibus adversarii mei tantum adversus me virus exugere nulli verecundati sunt.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.