Two celebrities' opinions are not common Reformed consent against Ames and the British deputies
Even granting Daillé and Rivet differed from Ames and the British — giving own-remission fiducia the same certainty as article-faith — that does not make their view common Reformed consent.
Both men held peculiar opinions many Reformed opposed.
Why weigh Reformers by those two rather than by Ames and the Anglican deputies to Dort?
Latin
CXLI. Sed ad institutum meum non necesse est, ut operam ponam in eorum dictis emolliendis atque excusandis. Esto enim Joannes Dallaéus & Andreas Rivetus hac in parte aliud senserint, quam Amesius, & Theologi Britanni, quorum sententia jam exposita est; & eandem certitudinem tribuerint fiduciae quam singuli fideles habere dicuntur de remissione peccatorum suorum quae competit ipsi fidei qua debemus amplecti fidei articulos: An inde sequitur posse tribui Reformatis, quod idem communi consensu cum duobus illis viris de re proposita doceant? Et quis nescit utrumque illorum habuisse peculiares quasdam opiniones, quibus hinc & inde multi ex Reformatis sese opposuerunt? Ac etiam quare potius ex duorum illorum virorum sententia Reformatorum fidem metiri deberemus, quam ex doctrina Amesii, & Theologorum Britannorum Ecclesiae Anglicanae nomine loquentium, & ab ea ad Synodum Dordracenam deputatorum?
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.