Theological Theses · §16

Justifying faith must be distinguished from historical faith; Rome's reply helps; miracle faith is not an eminent grade of justifying faith

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

But that justifying faith ought to be distinguished from historical faith is not hard to prove. For if historical faith were the same as justifying faith, then whoever had historical faith would by that very fact have justifying faith. Yet many hypocrites and ungodly people are endowed with historical faith who nevertheless lack justifying faith. For of this faith Scripture says that whoever believes does not perish but has eternal life (John 3:16), and that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4); and that in the Gospel the righteousness of God is revealed to all and upon all who believe (Romans 1:16-17). From which it is plain that no one is endowed with such faith who is not a partaker of righteousness and salvation. And therefore to those who are in a state of perdition and remain in sin, if they are said to believe, another faith must be assigned.

And certainly what the Pontificians say about these places helps our sentence. For they say that when Scripture says whoever believes has eternal life, it ought to be understood of those who believe as they ought and with the whole heart; and that the reason many believe in the Son and yet do not have life is that they believe badly, and not with the whole heart, and not as they ought — as may be seen in Bellarmine, book one On Justification, chapter ten, paragraph Adde quod. But who can with any reason affirm that it is the same faith by which someone believes well and by which someone believes badly; by which someone believes as he ought and by which someone believes as he ought not? Or that the faith by which someone believes badly, and not with the whole heart, and not as he ought, is the justifying faith which the Apostle says is imputed for righteousness (Romans 4)?

Next, that the faith of miracles is not an eminent grade of justifying faith is also manifest from this: that some are gifted with that faith who nevertheless do not have justifying faith. For to many who will say to Christ, Did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works? Christ will answer, I never knew you, as Christ himself witnesses (Matthew 7:22). Add that the Apostle in 1 Corinthians 12:9 numbers the faith of signs among the various charisms of the Spirit, which the Pontificians call graces given freely (gratiae gratis datae). Yet an eminent grade of justifying faith belongs to grace that makes acceptable (gratia gratum faciens). For it is given for the salvation of the one who has it — not, like those free gifts of the Spirit, for the salvation of others. Then if the faith of miracles were an excellent grade of justifying faith, Christ, when reproaching the disciples for the defect of that faith, would not say to them, If you had faith like a grain of mustard seed, you would say to this mountain, Move from here, and it would move, and nothing would be impossible for you (Matthew 17:20). For a grain of mustard seed denotes something very small in the Scriptures, and it amounts to the same as if Christ said, If you had even a tiny bit of faith.

Latin

XI. At fidem justificantem ab historica debere distingui, probare non est difficile. Si enim fides historica eadem esset cum justificante, tum quicunque fidem historicam haberet, hoc ipso haberet fidem justificantem: At hypocritae, et impii multi praediti sunt fide historica, qui tamen fide justificante carent. De hac enim Scriptura dicit, Quicunque credit non perire, sed vitam aeternam habere, et Christum esse finem legis in justitiam omni credenti: atque Evangelio justitiam Dei patefactam in omnes, et super omnes qui credunt. Unde patet neminem esse tali fide praeditum, qui non sit justitiae et salutis particeps. Ac proinde iis qui sunt in statu perditionis, et manent in peccato, si credere dicantur, aliam fidem esse assignandam. XII. Et certe quod ad haec loca dicunt Pontificii sententiam nostram juvat. Aiunt enim, quod Scriptura dicit, Quicunque credit vitam aeternam habet, intelligi debere de iis qui credunt sicut oportet, et toto corde: atque quod multi sint qui credunt in Filium, nec tamen vitam habent; inde esse, quod male credant, et non ex toto corde, et sicut oportet: ut videre est apud Bellarminum libro primo de justificatione, capite decimo, paragrapho Adde quod. At quis potest cum aliqua ratione affirmare eandem fidem esse, qua quis bene credit, et qua quis male credit: qua aliquis credit ut oportet, et qua aliquis credit ut non oportet? aut fidem illam qua quis male credit, nec toto corde, et sicut oportet, fidem esse justificantem, quam Apostolus dicit in justitiam imputari? Romanorum capite quarto. XIII. Deinde fidem miraculorum non esse gradum eminentem fidei justificantis, manifestum est etiam, ex eo quod quidam ista fide sunt donati, qui tamen non habent fidem justificantem. Multis enim qui Christo dicent, Nonne per nomen tuum prophetavimus, et in nomine tuo daemonia ejecimus, et virtutes multas fecimus? respondebit Christus, Non novi vos, ut testatur Christus ipse Matt. 7. 22. Adde quod Apostolus 1. Corint. 12. 9. fidem signorum numerat inter varia spiritus charismata, quae Pontificii vocant Gratias gratis datas. Atqui gradus eminens fidei justificantis ad gratiam gratum facientem pertinet. Datur enim ad salutem ejus, qui eam habet: non vero, ut illa dona Spiritus gratuita, ad salutem aliorum. Tum si fides miraculorum esset gradus excellens fidei justificantis, Christus, exprobrans discipulis fidei illius defectum, non diceret ipsis, Si fidem haberetis sicut granum sinapi, diceretis huic monti, Transi hinc, et transiret, et nihil esset impossibile vobis. Granum enim sinapi denotat aliquid minimum in Scripturis, et tantundem est ac si Christus diceret, Si vel tantillum fidei haberetis.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.