A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §715

Annotatio VI §.V AD PRIUS: Edite/Hoc — bread (Luther) or spiritual mode already in Jn 6

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

AD PRIUS is futile: “Eat, this is my body” does not prove spiritual food is taken corporally/orally.

Either Christ means the bread by “this” (Luther, many places — what hands took, broke, gave), or if he means his body, the eating-mode is the spiritual one he already taught in John 6 before the institution.

Latin

Frustra excipitur AD PRIUS: Spiritualem cibum, etiam corporaliter oraliterque accipi posse, quando à Christo jubetur ita accipi, dicente: Edite, Hoc est Corpus meum. Resp. (a) de pane Christum loqui, quem per Hoc intelligit, teste Luthero pluribus in locis, utpote quem solum corporalibus manibus acceperat, fregerat & dederat, de eodem dicendo: Hoc est corpus meum. (b) Si item de Corpore suo locutus Christus est, & istud edere jussit, utique modum edendi haud alium intellexit, quàm à se, jam ante Cœnæ S. Institutionem, Joh. 6. edoctum, i. e. solum Spiritualem.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.