A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §675

Annotatio V §.XI: receiving Eucharist ≠ oral eating body; incorruptibility ≠ corporeal feeding

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

They also teach the faithful’s bodies receive the Eucharistic bread and, receiving, hold resurrection hope — no longer merely corruptible.

But receiving the Eucharist ≠ orally eating Christ’s body; and resurrection hope for receivers ≠ the Author’s reading that corruptible bodies are fed into incorruption by Christ’s incorruptible body and blood.

Latin

Sic etiam corpora nostra, i.e. fidelium, tam Eucharistiam, i.e. panem Eucharisticum, percipere, quàm percipientia, jam non amplius corruptibilia esse, sed spem resurrectionis ad vitam æternam habentia, profitentur. At aliud est, corpora fidelium Eucharistiam percipere; aliud, Ore corporis, corpus Christi manducare; Iterúmque: aliud, corpora fidelium Eucharistiam percipientia, non corruptibilia esse, vel, in morte mansura, sed spem resurrectionis habere; aliud (quomodo Autor Irenæum interpretatur) corpora nostra corruptibilia, corpore & sanguine Christi incorruptibilibus, nutriri & ali, hôcque pacto incorruptibilia fieri.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.