A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §628

Annotatio V §.I: both true (Jn 6); PRIOR oral cannot deny carnal; critic’s dual lapse

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Both proper and improper eating are true (by the thing signified). John 6 settles the improper’s truth. The PRIOR / Oral cannot without contradiction be denied Carnal — the mouth is flesh.

A disputant in one §.8 slips twice: opposing supernatural only to Capernaite/carnal but not to oral, and treating Oral and True as synonyms — as if faith-alone spiritual eating were not true.

Latin

Utraque, tam Propria, quàm Impropria, manducatio vera est, si non veritate rei significantis, tamen veritate rei significatæ. De veritate prioris Manducationis nemo ambigit; De veritate posterioris neminem sinit ambigere Sermo Christi Joh. 6. PRIOR, uti, per pleonasmum, Oralis dicitur, cùm non nisi ore fieri possit; Ita non, nisi per contradictionem, omnino negatur esse Carnalis, cùm quod orale est, eatenus, quatenus tale, non possit non carnale agnosci, ore humanô hominis carni, ex parte saltem, annumerando. Ut proinde, unô eodemque paragraphô octavô, non unâ & simplici vice lapsus deprehendatur non nemo disputans, quando tùm Supernaturalem manducationem Carnali quidem & Capernaiticæ, non item Orali, oppositam censet: quasi verò Oralis, Carnalis non esset, aut Capernaitica, saltem ex parte & quatenus Oralis est; tùm Oralem, & Veram, Manducationem, pro synonymis habet, quasi verò Spiritualis Manducatio, solâ fide peracta, non esset vera?

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.