A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §50

First Hunnian falsehood: faith as a prerequisite quality in those to be elect, not Augustine's means decreed with salvation

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

The first falsehood of the Hunnians was this: as if those who follow Augustine's doctrine want an election absolute from the means — apart from any regard to faith and perseverance, which are fitting means on our side. In fact these do not deny an election founded on Christ's merit as the means of execution — that is, made with a view to Christ's merit as the meritorious cause of life and salvation. But for Hunnius and his party, faith was treated as a prerequisite condition in those to be elect, as an antecedent cause, as a quality of those to be chosen. For Augustine and those who vote with him, it is a required condition in the elect, decreed for them together with salvation, as a means to salvation and a necessary quality of those who are to be saved — whence they are said to be saved and justified through faith, in Christ, that is, through Christ.

Latin

ΠΡΩΤΟΝ Hunnianorum ψεῦδος fuit, quasi sequentes doctrinam Augustini velint electionem absolutam à mediis; citra intuitum fidei & perseverantiæ, quæ media sunt congrua ex parte nostri; Sic nec negant hi Electionem fundatam in merito Christi, ut medio executionis, id est, factam intuitu meriti Christi, tanquam causæ meritoriæ Vitæ & salutis; Sed Hunnio cum suis considerata fides fuit ut conditio prærequisita in eligendis, ut causa antecedens, ut qualitas eligendorum; Quæ Augustino & ὁμοψήφοις est conditio requisita in electis, simul iis cum salute decreta, tanquam medium ad salutem, & necessaria qualitas servandorum, undè dicantur servari, justificari per fidem, in Christo, id est, per Christum.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.