FathersVia Patrum

A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §5

Prefatio: Three Crimina charged — Supper consensus, oral manducation as cannibalism, and Sandomierz cruelty

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

But now I must return from the digression into the road; and those thicker clouds of the gravest accusations which my bitterest Adversaries pour out — not yet to be named by me, and without even designating the places and writings that fill and infect them, lest even so I should be said to have done them injury and, by uncovering their nakedness, to have exacted revenge (their words meanwhile being recited, and by them easily recognized) — now come to be calmly discussed, the rest vanishing into air by their own lightness. They are three in number:

FIRST, they charge me in a strange way with this: that I dared to assert that a Fundamental Consensus in the Doctrine of the Holy Supper really obtains between Lutherans and Reformed; and that, using Beza's words, I said the Body of Christ is as far from the Sacred Supper as Heaven is from Earth.

SECOND, with a great imprecation they accuse me of having imputed to their Forum the dogma of the Oral Manducation of Christ's Body and the Drinking of His Blood as Anthropophagy and Theophagy.

THIRD, they paint me as crueler than Nero himself, chiefly on this ground: that I have praised the Sandomierz Consensus of the Evangelicals, whose patrons they boast behaved cruelly toward Lutherans.

Latin

Caeterum e diverticulo in viam redeundum mihi nunc est, et gravissimarum accusationum nebulae, crassiores illae, quas acerbissimi Adversarii (nondum a me nominandi, citra etiam Locorum Scriptorumque, quae opplent inficiuntque, designationem, ne vel sic injuriam illis intulisse, nuditateque eorum detecta, vindictam exercuisse dici possim, verbis interim eorum recitatis, ab iis nullo negotio dignoscendis) offundunt, placide nunc veniunt discutiendae, reliquis suamet levitate in auram abituris. Sunt autem numberó Tres: PRIMO, mirum in modum hoc homine me criminantur, quod ausus fuerim asserere Consensum in Doctrina de S. Coena Fundamentalem, Lutheranos inter et Reformatos, re ipsa intercedere; et Bezae verbis usus, Corpus Christi a Coena Sacra tam procul abesse, quam a Terra Coelum est. SECUNDO, Magna cum imprecatione accusant me imputatae, in Forum, de Orali Corporis Christi Manducatione Sanguinisque ejus Bibitione Dogmati, Anthropophagiae et Theophagiae. TERTIO, Ipso Nerone crudeliorem me fingunt, hoc potissimum nomine, quod Sendomiriensem Evangelicorum Consensum laudaverim, cujus Patronos erga Lutheranos crudelem se gessisse jactitant.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.