A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §46

Sufficiency and gospel vocation granted; eternal will to save the reprobate without the Spirit's special work denied

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

It was also supposed that the Reformed deny either the sufficiency of Christ's redemption, or even its extension to all — or to the whole world. That we freely grant, but in Holy Scripture's sense: as to all who are to be brought into glory, even any at all, throughout the whole world, with no distinction under the New Testament economy.

So the Reformed do not deny the vocation that comes through the ministers of the Gospel — general, promiscuous, no one excluded. But they do deny an eternal will of God to save and redeem even the reprobate (whom the Lutherans themselves acknowledge as such according to foreknowledge) without the Holy Spirit's special and efficacious operation — which, from their own concessions, they have already granted is impossible.

Who then, unless that harsh fellow-servant, would damn forever those who deny these things in this sense?

Latin

Suppositum etiam fuit, quasi Reformati Redemptionis Christi aut sufficientiam negent, aut extensionem etiam ad omnes vel ad totum Mundum; Quod sanè largimur, sed in sensu Scripturae S. quoad omnes in gloriam adducendos, etiam quosvis, per totum Mundum, nullo discrimine sub Oeconomia N. T. Ità nec Vocationem negant Reformati, quae fit per Ministros Evangelii, generalem, promiscuam, nemine excluso; Cæterùm negant voluntatem Dei aeternam servandi & redimendi etiam reprobos (quos Lutherani agnoscunt κατὰ πρόγνωσιν tales) sine speciali efficacique Operatione Spiritus S., praestito ab ipsis impossibili, ex concessis. Quis verò, nisi immitis ille Conservus, aeternum damnet ista hoc sensu negantes?

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.