A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §355

Annotatio I §.V: Augustine’s signum corporis; contention de verbis not de re — Epist. Buceri ad Pontanum

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Calling bread a figure and sign of Christ’s body does not prove the body is absent — else Augustine too would be read as teaching bare bread, though he wrote against Adamantus: Christ did not hesitate to say this is my body when giving the sign of His body.

Our doctors never meant to deny presence; they only press that bread is not substantially the body, to lead people from visible bread to invisible Christ — so the fight is about words, not the thing (Bucer to Pontanus).

Latin

Deinde & hoc manifestum est ex hac locutione, qua panis figura & signum corporis Christi esse dicitur, nequaquam sequi quòd corpus Christi propterea non adsit: aliàs enim de Augustino quoque dici posset, quòd nudum panem in Coena esse senserit, cum tamen contraria sententia in libris ipsius ubique reperiatur: nam contra Adamantum scribens his verbis usus est: Christus non dubitavit dicere, hoc est corpus meum, cùm daret signum corporis sui. Cùm igitur nostrae partis Doctores per interpretationem suam Christi praesentiam tollere aut negare nequaquam voluerint, sed in omnibus scriptis & libris suis eam sint testati, nec aliud quidpiam quam hoc planum facere & obtinere interpretatione sua studuerint, quòd panis non sit substantialiter corpus Christi, hac ratione vulgum à pane visibili ad Christum invisibilem adducere volentes, equidem non de re, sed tantum de verbis contentiones esse reperio. Epist. Buceri ad Pontanum non procul ab initio.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.