A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §197

Annotatio III §.I: Philip’s letter for the Zwinglians — shared articles; Coena by faith; response too hard — Chytraeus / Buddeus Luther replies

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

So the Most Illustrious Prince argues for the Zwinglians in one letter (Chytraeus, History of the Augsburg Confession, p. 652): since they agree with you in the other articles, confess Christ as you do, grant that Christ is eaten in the Supper by faith — and that eating is needed for salvation — and do not strip God of omnipotence, but read the words by the analogy of faith according to Scripture as they take them; and since Christ’s glorified body cannot feed a stomach, so He can scarcely be eaten except by believers and through faith — your sentence and reply look harder than they need to be, and I hope God will bring you to a truer view.

For Luther’s answering letters, see the recent Buddeus Supplement, Epistle 122, pages 1024 and 102.

Latin

Sic enim Illustrissimus Princeps pro Zwinglianis in quadam Epistola disputat: Itaque mihi videtur, cùm in aliis Articulis vobiscum consentiant Zwingliani & Christum eâdem ratione, quâ vos, confiteantur, concedant etiam Christum in Coena per fidem manducari, quae Manducatio ad Salutem necessaria est, nec Omnipotentiae laudem Deo adimant, sed juxta Analogiam fidei Secundum Scripturam, sic intelligenda esse verba sentiant, ut ipsi intelligunt: Cùmq;, Christus, quia clarificatum Corpus habet, quô venter cibari nequit, vix aliter manducari possit, quàm à credentibus & per fidem; hac, inquam, cum ita se habeant, mihi videtur Sententia & Responsio vestra durior & non necessaria esse, spero etiam, Deo dante, vos diligentiùs cogitaturos & veriorem Sententiam secuturos esse, Chytraeus. Hist. August. Confess. p. 652. Responsorias Lutheri vide in Supplemento Buddeano nupero, Epistola 122. pag. 1024. 102.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.