On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §82

Cap. VIII: The penalty's reach conceded; original vice stands between

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

I grant the whole argument. Which of us ever denied that the penalty of Adam's fall has pervaded all? We contend only this: between that penalty and Adam's fall, original vice has intervened, and to that vice the penalty is owed proximately.

Latin

Concedo totum arg. Quis enim nostrum unquam negavit, lapsus Adae poenam in omnes esse pervagatam? Tantum contendimus, inter eam & lapsum Adae intervenisse vitium originale cui proxime poena debetur.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.