On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §693

Man. Post. Cap. X: PLAC — the fight is antecedent imputation: by what law, if any?

But the question was about the antecedent or immediate imputation of Adam’s first actual sin to all Adam’s posterity: according to what law does it take place?

If it takes place according to some law or denunciation of a law, it could not but be that that law was violated; why then does the learned man ascribe that imputation everywhere to the free will of God?

Latin

Sed quaerebatur de imputatione primi Adae peccati actualis antecedente seu immediata, omnibus Adae posteris, secundum quam legem fiat? Si fiat secundum aliquam legem seu legis denunciationem, non potuit non fieri quin lex illa violaretur; cur igitur eam imputationem Vir doctus liberae Dei voluntati ascribit passim?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.