On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §648

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — imputation and real inhaerentia fight; why do/suffer what another did loco me?

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

For what belongs by imputation does not belong by real inherence or inexistence. Those two fight each other. For why should I either do or suffer what another has done or suffered in my place?

Latin

Nam quod per imputationem convenit, non convenit per realem inhaerentiam sive inexistientiam. Duo istiusmodi inter se pugnant. Cur enim aut faciam aut patiar quod alius loco meo vel fecit vel passus est?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.