On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §641

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — if Adam sinned loco nostro, why not also punished loco with corruption at once?

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Besides: if he sinned in our place, and that sin merited the penalty which is sin—namely corruption—tell me, I ask, why was he not also afflicted with that penalty in our place? For at the very moment he sinned, in the same he was made corrupt and vicious and unjust.

Latin

Praeterea si loco nostro peccavit & peccatum illud merebatur poenam quae est peccatum, videlicet corruptionem: dic mihi, quaeso, cur non sit etiam loco nostro illa affectus poena? nam quo temporis articulo peccavit, eodem corruptus & vitiosus & iniustus factus est.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.