On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §633

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — Zanchius denies actu-sin in Adam: we were not yet actu

That Zanchius—whom you praise for your view in chapter 7 of your treatise—denies, adding this reason: because we were not yet in act. For how could it be that, when we were not yet in act, we should sin by act?

Latin

Id Zanchius, quem tu pro tua sententia laudas Cap. tui tractatus vii. negat, addita hac ratione, quia nondum eramus actu. Nam qui fieri potuit, ut, quum nondum essemus actu, peccaremus actu?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.