On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §625

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — imputation when not yet separate persons; reckoned as one man in Adam

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

That imputation was therefore made when we were not yet persons separate and distant from Adam—or, as the one I was dealing with puts it, when we were considered by God as one man in Adam. Now, I think, you yourself, reader, sufficiently see what force the argument has.

Latin

Facta est igitur ista imputatio cum nondum essemus personae separatae & distantes ab Adamo: vel, ut loquitur is quicum mihi res erat, cum consideraremus a Deo tanquam unus homo in Adamo. Nunc, opinor, quam vim habeat argumentum, ipse per te, Lector, satis intelligis.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.