On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §621

Man. Post. Cap. IX: GAR Resp — hard to see how that proves Adam's-sin imputation; no confused hypostasis

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

GAR. Resp. It is hard enough to see and say how the force of this reason assigns the imputation of Adam's sin. For either I am far wrong, or none of those who fight for this imputation ever dreamed that his own person, or any other man's, is confused with Adam's person, or so indistinct as to have coalesced into one hypostasis with him. That cannot even be conceived in the mind. Etc.

Latin

GAR. Resp. Huius rationis vim satis ad assignandam peccati Adami imputationem videre difficile est & dicere. Nam aut longe fallor, aut nemo eorum qui pro hac imputatione pugnant, unquam somniavit personam suam, vel alterius cuiuscumque hominis, esse confusam cum persona Adami, aut ita indistinctam, ut in unum ὑπόστασιν cum ea coaluerit. Hoc ne quidem animo concipi potest. &c.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.