On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §577

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — split double question: when Christ satisfied vs when imputed

Besides, the proposition when we satisfy in Christ, since it is not proper, needs explanation, and must be returned to its proper meaning: otherwise the fallacy of many questions is committed: for ns: 1. When did Christ satisfy? 2. When is Christ's satisfaction imputed to us? To that I answer, when he suffered on the cross; to this, when we believe in him.

Latin

Praeterea propositio quando satisfacimus in Christo, cum propria non sit, eget expositione, & revocanda est ad propriam: alioqui committitur fallacia plurium interrogationum: continet enim has duas quaestiones: 1. Quando Christus satisfecit? 2. Quando nobis Christi satisfactio imputatur? Ad illam respondeo, quando passus est in cruce; Ad hanc, quando credimus in eum.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.