On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §563

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — learned man inconsistent: in alio peccare = imputation, then prior to it

Next the learned man does not seem to himself to stand consistent enough. For he had said in the preceding paragraph that for someone to sin in another designates imputation by force of the word, and that to sin in another and for another's sin to be imputed are the same. Now he will have them to be diverse; and that to sin in another is prior to another's sin being imputed; and that this as the later, that as the prior and cause.

Latin

Deinde non videtur Vir doctus sibi satis constare. Dixerat enim paragrapho praecedente aliquem in alio peccare ex vi vocis designare imputationem, idemque esse in alio peccare ac peccatum alienum imputari. Nunc vult esse diversa; & prius esse peccare in alio, quam peccatum alienum imputari; hocque tanquam posterius, illud supponere, tanquam prius & causam.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.