On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §533

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — all sinners because all die; not from latent corruption

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Add that the Apostle proves in this place that all humans are sinners, that sin is in the world, that is in humans, by this argument, that all die. Do you think he proves that sin is in humans, because there is sin in humans, namely hereditary corruption? Does he draw the argument from a latent moral corruption, which itself was to be proved, when it was at hand from the open and known death of all?

Latin

Adde quod Apostolus probat hoc loco omnes homines esse peccatores, peccatum in mundo, id est in hominibus, hoc argumento, quod omnes moriuntur. Putasne probare eum peccatum esse in hominibus, quia sit in hominibus peccatum, nimirum corruptio haereditaria? Num a latente corruptione morali, quae ipsa erat probanda, ducit argumentum, cum suppeteret a patente & nota omnium morte?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.