On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §496

Man. Post. Cap. IX: minor clear / major agreed; tip before GAR Cap. VII

The Minor is clear. How the Major could be denied I do not see. For it is agreed and convenes between us that through Adam hereditary corruption which is truly sin entered into all humans: which being posited, what is there why we should not take the Apostle's words of it?

Latin

Minor est liquida. Maior quomodo negari possit non video. Constat enim & convenit inter nos per Adamum corruptionem haereditariam quae vere peccatum est in omnes homines ingressam esse: quo posito, quid est quamobrem de ea non accipiamus Apostoli verba?

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.