On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §475

Man. Post. Cap. IX: deferred replies / three chapters of human testimonies

But by what counsel it was done by you, I do not know: that when in the Theses I went to meet the arguments which are drawn from Rom. 5, and proposed to you all my replies to be run through and refuted, you yet relegated them to chapter IX of your treatise with no mention at all of them made in this place where you treat those arguments, three chapters even being interposed between them and this treatment of yours, by which you try to suppress my opinion with human testimoniesiesies.

Latin

Quo autem consilio a te sit factum, nescio, quod cum in Thesibus obviam iverim argumentis quae ex Rom. v. ducuntur, & meas responsiones omnes tibi percurrendas ac refellendas proposueris, tu tamen eas ad caput usque IX. tractatus tui relegasti nulla prorsus earum mentione facta hoc loco, quo argumenta illa tractas, interpositis etiam inter eas & hanc tuam tractationem tribus capitibus, quibus meam sententiam humanis testimoniis opprimere conaris.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.