On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §365

Man. Post. Cap. VI: PLAC imputing/punishing the not-yet-existent paradox tip

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

This latter presupposes the existence and the sin of him who is punished. For to impute sin to one not yet existing, to punish one not yet existing, seems to me a paradox.

Latin

Hoc supponit existentiam & peccatum illius qui punitur. Imputare enim peccatum nondum existenti, punire nondum existentem, mihi paradoxum videtur.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.