On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §210

Man. Post. Cap. III: Laudo fons/radix — nature law not judge sentence; before-fall decree

I also praise these words of yours: just as a polluted spring pollutes its streams, and as a root puts out shoots after its own kind—bad shoots if the root is bad—IN EXACTLY THE SAME WAY the first man, corrupted and a sinner, begot and brought forth corrupted, sinful children.

I take that up. A polluted spring infects its streams, and a bad root yields bad shoots, only by nature's law that each thing begets its like. Why not say the same of the first man, if corrupted he begot us corrupted in exactly that way? If that natural law, already set and sanctioned before the sin, is enough to propagate original sin, why charge it to God's justice and to the sentence of God the Judge—to my great scandal, who complain that God's justice is deeply wronged? The very word "propagation" could have warned you: propagation is nature's work, following nature's laws, while God, as nature's author and conserver, keeps those laws in force by His concurrence. They hang on a decree that, in nature's order, seems to me to have come before the decree permitting the fall. A later decree neither could nor should undo them.

Latin

Laudo etiam haec tua verba, Quemadmodum fons infectus rivos etiam inficit, & sicut radix producit surculos secundum speciem suam, malos scilicet, si mala est, EODEM PRORSUS MODO primus homo corruptus & peccator genuit & protulit filios corruptos & peccatores. Subsumo, atqui fons infectus inficit rivos & radix mala profert malos surculos ea tantummodo lege Naturae, qua sibi quodque simile gignit. Cur igitur non idem statuis de primo homine, si nos eodem prorsus modo corruptus corruptos genuit? Si lex ista naturae sufficit ad peccati originalis propagationem ante peccatum constituta & sancita, quid est quamobrem eam dei justitiae, dei judicis sententiae imputes non sine magno meo scandalo, qui sic magnam Dei justitiae fieri injuriam queror? atque hujus te rei ipsum propagationis nomen admonere potuit: est enim propagatio opus naturae, quae suas in ea leges sequitur, Deo, ut est naturae author & conservator, leges illas suo concursu conservante & constabiliente, pendent enim ex decreto, quod ordine naturae decretum de lapsu permittendo mihi videtur antecessisse. Itaque posteriore decreto rescindi nec potuerunt, nec debuerunt.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.