On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §205

Man. Post. Cap. II: question of strict sense; two questions ahead; before Cap. III

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Among us the sole live question is whether it is penalty in that most proper, strict sense I just marked out. You did not keep the two questions apart. God willing, I will take them up in turn as the chance comes, following your own steps.

Latin

Sed quaeritur inter nos duntaxat, num sit poena sensu illo, quem explicavi, maxime proprio & stricto. Has duas quaestiones, quia tu non separasti, ut feret occasio, tua sequens vestigia, Deo favente, tractabo.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.