On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §152

Cap. XIV: Nullam extare in manuscriptis — printed rationes enough; MS survey opens

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Chapter XIV. That no argument in the manuscript pamphlets can prove the immediate or antecedent imputation of Adam's sin. Of the printed arguments I have managed to read, enough has been said, I judge. I have seen many manuscripts, and in them I have noticed almost nothing that is not already in books issued by the printers—save that first piece to which Placeus answered in the manuscript Garissoles later called the later one, and on whose refutation Garissoles spent a great part of his book.

Latin

CAPUT XIV. Nullam extare in manuscriptis libellis rationem quae peccati Adamici imputationem immediatam seu antecedentem probare possit. De Argumentis typis excusis, quae mihi legere contigit, dictum est, ut ego arbitror, satis. Manuscriptorum vidi complura: Sed in quibus nihil fere animadverti, quod non legatur in scriptis Typographorum opera publicatis; si primum illud excipias, cui Placeus manuscripto illo respondit, quod D. Garissolius posterius appellavit, et in quo refellendo magnam partem libri sui consumpsit.

About this text

New English, free to read. Open any section below.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.