Theological Theses · §769

Notitia is prerequisite, not a constitutive part of faith — against Bucanus, with Ames and Wittich

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Reformed disagree on faith’s parts/acts.

Notitia (apprehension of what is to be believed), apart from assent: constitutive part (Bucanus) or only prerequisite (Ames, Wittich)?

Le Blanc sides with Ames/Wittich: you cannot rightly believe without some notion, but faith does not consist in that notion.

Bare notitia can sit in profane minds — even atheists know what Christians are told to believe — without a spark of faith.

Latin

XCIII. Quod attinet ad partes, sive actus fidei, vidimus quoque Scholae Reformatae Doctores inter se non consentire, qui & quales illi sint, eosque pluribus modis enumerare. Et primo quidem quaeritur de notitia, prout ab assensu distinguitur, & significat quandam rei, quae ad credendum proponitur, apprehensionem & praeconceptionem, an sit pars fidem constituens, ut Bucanus & alii censent; an vero solum actus ad fidem praerequisitus & antecedaneus, quae est sententia Guilielmi Amesii, & Christophori Wittichii. Ad quam posteriorem sententiam accedimus. Quamvis enim nemo rite credere possit, qui non habeat aliquam notitiam & conceptionem rei quae credenda est, fides tamen non consistit in illa notitia, quae sine ulla fide in aliquo consistere potest, & inest etiam mentibus prorsus profanis, & in qua nemo possit vere dicere, vel minimum esse fidei initium. Siquidem multi Athei non ignorant quae sint illa quorum fides a Christianis exigitur.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.