Circumcision and the sacraments show precepts may lack intrinsic light; God's authority is the chief ground
When the Israelites in Egypt were taught that every male was to be circumcised on the eighth day, that they were to abstain from blood, that some animals might be eaten and others not, and more of that kind, no one can deny those things were to be embraced by them with faith, as things pleasing and acceptable to God. Yet who could sincerely and from the heart say those things had in themselves a light enough to make faith, and enough to compel believers' minds to conclude that God had commanded and handed them down? The same can be said of us today about that washing of water used in Baptism, and about taking bread and wine at the Lord's table.
So when many dogmas and precepts must be taken up by faith, though they do not have in themselves the light and evidence by which they would prove themselves with enough certainty true and handed down by God, it is clear that the principal ground and basis of the faith by which we take up what God's Word delivers and religion's dogmas is not the thing's own truth and evidence, but rather the truth and authority of God teaching and revealing.
Latin
XXX. Quum vero Israelitae in Aegypto docerentur marem omnem octavo die esse circumcidendum, a sanguine abstinendum esse, quibusdam animalibus vesci licere, aliis non licere, et plura hujusmodi, nemo negare potest quin ista illis fide amplectenda fuerint, ut res Deo gratae et acceptae. Et tamen quis sincere et ex animo affirmare possit ista in se lucem habuisse, qua sufficienter fidem sui facerent, et unde mens fidelium efficaciter compelleretur ut crederet haec a Deo jussa et tradita fuisse. Idemque hodie nostri respectu, dici potest de lavacro illo aquae quod in Baptismo usurpatur, et de sumptione panis et vini in mensa Domini. Cum igitur fide suscipienda sint dogmata, et praecepta multa, quae non eam in se habent lucem et evidentiam, qua se satis certo vera esse comprobent et a Deo tradita, manifestum est fidei, qua res verbo Dei traditas et religionis dogmata suscipimus, rationem et basin praecipuam, non esse ipsam rei veritatem atque evidentiam, sed potius veritatem et authoritatem Dei docentis et revelantis.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.