Theological Theses · §6

The object of theology is God as the savior of men, not deity considered apart from that respect

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

As for the object of theology, it is to be noted that sometimes the object of a science is said to be whatever the science considers in any way. So the object of theology is not one. For it considers many and very diverse things: God, the church, angels, the sacraments. Yet all these agree in one common appellation, insofar as they fall under the theologian's consideration. For whatever the theologian treats can be called divine things. For they are either God himself, or other things ordered in some way to God. Nor is anything properly considered by the theologian except with some respect to God. So if anyone asks about the object of theology, it can not ineptly be answered that that object is divine things.

But for the most part the object of any science is said to be that of which the science principally intends to give us knowledge, and on account of which it considers all the rest — because, namely, they lead to a fuller and more perfect acquaintance with it. Of this kind the object of theology is God, which almost all confess, and which the very word theology teaches, which, as was noted above, means speech about God. But it is not agreed whether that object is God simply, as God is, or rather under some certain respect. The former is defended by the more celebrated scholastics following Thomas Aquinas, and they state that the object of theology is God as God is, and, as they speak, under the reason of deity. But this seems to us too loose and general. Nor is the scope of theology to lead us simply into the knowledge of God as God is; rather it treats of God with some respect to men.

Therefore the object of theology can more conveniently be said to be God, as God is, and the savior of men. For the whole of Scripture proposes God to us under this respect. And it principally intends to teach us what benefits of God are toward men, and what worship and obedience he in turn requires of them. But if it touches any other things, it does so in order to declare and confirm these more. For example, when it teaches that there are three Persons in God — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit — its scope is not simply to teach us this truth; but by it it wills to inform us more clearly and richly concerning the manner of our redemption and salvation, which was procured for us through Christ, and is applied and sealed to us through the Spirit. And likewise the attributes of God, such as justice and mercy, are narrated in the Scriptures in relation to men, so that they may know how far the justice of God is to be feared by them, and what refuge they ought to seek in his mercy.

Latin

XXI. Quod ad objectum Theologiae spectat, notandum est, aliquando objectum scientiae dici quicquid scientia quovis modo considerat. Ita Theologiae objectum non est unum. Multa enim et valde diversa considerat, Deum, Ecclesiam, Angelos, Sacramenta. Quae omnia tamen in una communi appellatione conveniunt, quatenus sub Theologi considerationem cadunt. Nam quaecunque tractat Theologus possunt vocari res divinae. Sunt enim, vel Deus ipse, vel alia quae ad Deum aliquo modo ordinantur. Nec quicquam a Theologo proprie consideratur; nisi cum aliquo respectu ad Deum. Itaque, si quis de objecto Theologiae quaerat, non inepte responderi potest, objectum illud esse res divinas. XXII. Sed ut plurimum objectum scientiae cujuspiam dicitur, id cujus scientia praecipue intendit cognitionem nobis dare, et propter quod cetera omnia considerat: quia, scilicet, ad ejus ampliorem et perfectiorem notitiam conducunt. Hujusmodi objectum Theologiae Deus est, quod plerique omnes fatentur, et docet ipsa Theologiae vox, quae, ut supra notatum est, significat sermonem de Deo: sed non convenit, an illud objectum sit Deus simpliciter, ut Deus est: an vero sub certo aliquo respectu. Prius illud tuentur Scholastici celebriores Thomam Aquinatem secuti, statuuntque objectum Theologiae esse Deum, prout Deus est, atque ut loquuntur sub ratione Deitatis. Verum hoc nobis videtur nimis laxum et generale. Neque scopus Theologiae est nos simpliciter in Dei, ut Deus est, cognitionem ducere; sed de Deo agit cum aliquo ad homines respectu. XXIII. Itaque convenientius Theologiae objectum dici potest Deus, ut Deus est, et servator hominum. Tota quippe Scriptura Deum nobis sub hoc respectu proponit. Ac praecipue intendit nos docere quae sint erga homines Dei beneficia, quemque vicissim ab illis cultum exigat et obedientiam. Si quae vero alia tangit, id facit ad ista magis declaranda et confirmanda. Exempli gratia, cum tradit esse tres in Deo Personas, Patrem, Filium, et Spiritum sanctum, scopus ejus non est simpliciter nos hanc veritatem docere: sed per id vult nos clarius et uberius informare, de modo redemptionis atque salutis nostrae, quae per Christum nobis parta est, et per Spiritum nobis applicatur et obsignatur. Et similiter Dei attributa, ut justitia et misericordia enarrantur in Scripturis relate ad homines, ut scilicet sciant, quatenus Dei justitia ipsis timenda sit, et quodnam debeant in ejus misericordia quaerere perfugium.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.