Theological Theses · §396

Most simple — first being, first one

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Every composition kind removed — God is most simple.

First being = first one; perfect unity bars composition.

Composites depend on prior parts and a unifier — God has neither.

Latin

XXVI. Porro, ex istis apparet Deum esse simplicissimum, & nullam prorsus compositionem in eo reperiri, quandoquidem singula compositionis genera ab eo removimus. Et confirmatur ex eo quod Deus est primum ens, adeoque primum unum. Nam ens & unum convertuntur. Perfecta autem unitas compositionem excludit. Nam quod compositum est, aliquo modo non est unum sed multa, quoniam ex multis constat. Deinde primum ens nihil habet se prius. Sed quicquid compositum est posterius est suis partibus componentibus, & dependet ab illis. Ac denique quae sunt diversa non conveniunt in unum, nisi per aliquam causam uniantur. Deus autem causam non habet.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.