Theological Theses · §36

Antiquity, providence preserving Scripture, and the sects' consensus jointly commend its authority

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Besides these, many arguments can be taken toward conciliating Scripture's authority and veneration from Scripture's antiquity, from God's care in preserving it, and from the world's hatred toward it, and God's just judgment against its haters and despisers. For the books of Moses, which are as it were the basis and foundation of the whole of Scripture, are by far the most ancient of all that exist. Indeed there are no writings that equal the antiquity of Solomon and David. And yet almost the whole world long waged war against Scripture and tried to abolish it — as in Jewish times that Antiochus Epiphanes, and in Christian memory the Roman Emperors, whose power was so great and whose empire so widely extended. But as much as the world worked to abolish it, so much did God's providence watch that it should remain safe and entire hitherto.

Nor is the consensus of the nations — indeed of the various sects — of small moment in this matter. Since today three chief sects thrive, afterward subdivided into many others — namely the Jewish, the Christian, and the Mahometan — which occupy the greatest part of the world. Jews, Christians, and Mahometans all acknowledge the authority of the Old Testament. The Jews indeed reject the New Testament, but the Mahometans hold it in esteem with us, and at least venerate Christ as God's greatest Prophet. What then could compel so many peoples, disagreeing among themselves in customs and sects, and mutually pursuing one another with the keenest hatreds, to approve these books as sacred and divine, unless the force of truth itself and a certain divine efficacy?

Which arguments, although perhaps not all equally valid if taken singly by themselves, nevertheless when taken together have the greatest force toward proving Scripture's excellence and conciliating authority to it. Nay, those superior ones which we have explained more widely we judge to be such that by them Scripture's authority can validly be asserted and proved even against atheists and the profane, who can retort and oppose nothing that has any force, and whose vanity it is not hard to show.

Latin

XXIX. Praeter haec ad conciliandam Scripturae authoritatem et venerationem, multa possunt argumenta sumi a Scripturae antiquitate, a cura Dei in ea conservanda, et a mundi in eam odio, justoque Dei judicio adversus osores et contemptores ejus. Etenim libri Mosis, qui sunt veluti totius Scripturae basis et fundamentum, omnium qui exstant sunt longe antiquissimi. Imo nulla sunt scripta quae Salomonis et Davidis antiquitatem aequent. Et tamen totus pene orbis adversus Scripturam bellum diu gessit, et conatus est illam abolere, ut Judaicis temporibus Antiochus ille Epiphanes: Christianorum vero memoria Imperatores Romani, quorum tanta fuit potentia et tam late patens imperium. Verum quantum sategit mundus eam abolere, tantum vigilavit Dei providentia ut salva et integra hucusque permaneret. XXX. Neque parvi momenti est gentium, imo sectarum variarum hac in re consensus. Cum hodie vigeant tres praecipuae sectae, in multas alias postea subdivisae, Judaica scilicet, Christiana et Mahumetana quae partem orbis maximam occupant. Judaei, Christiani, et Mahumetani omnes Veteris Testamenti authoritatem agnoscunt. Novum vero Testamentum Judaei quidem rejiciunt, sed Mahumetani illud nobiscum in pretio habent, Christumque saltem tanquam maximum Dei Prophetam venerantur. Quid autem compellere potuit tot populos moribus et sectis inter se discrepantes, et acerrimis odiis sese mutuo prosequentes, ut libros hosce tanquam sacros et divinos probarent, nisi vis ipsa veritatis et divina quaedam efficacia? XXXI. Quae quidem argumenta licet omnia forte perinde valida non sint, si per se sumantur singula, maximam tamen simul sumpta vim habent ad praestantiam Scripturae probandam et authoritatem illi conciliandam. Quin superiora illa quae latius explicuimus, talia esse judicamus, ut iis valide possit Scripturae authoritas asseri et probari etiam adversus Atheos et profanos, qui nihil regerere et opponere possunt quod vim aliquam habeat, cujusque vanitatem facile non sit ostendere.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.