Adversaries themselves confess Moses' and Christ's miracles; Jews invent magic or the Name
But besides, that the miracles reported as done by Moses are true, and likewise those attributed to Christ and his Apostles, is clear from the adversaries' own confession. For as to Christ, the Jews who are most hostile enemies of the Christian name neither formerly dared, nor even now dare, to deny that Christ performed miracles: but they have invented I know not what to elude the force of the argument we draw therefrom — namely either that Christ did those things by magic art which he had learned in Egypt, or by virtue of that tetragrammaton Name whose right pronunciation and exposition he held. For they fable that whoever knows how to pronounce that name rightly can by its force do any wonderful works. The vanity of that invention is clear of itself, and there is no need to refute it. Here we only note that the truth of Christ's miracles is not a little confirmed thereby: since the Jews who most envy his glory neither dare nor are able openly to deny that those things were done. And likewise very many of the Gentiles bore testimony to Moses and acknowledged the truth of the Mosaic history, as is to be seen in the books of Josephus against Apion, and of Eusebius on the Preparation of the Gospel.
Latin
XXV. Sed praeterea vera esse quae facta perhibentur a Mose miracula, et similiter ea quae tribuuntur Christo et Apostolis ejus, ex ipsa adversariorum confessione patet. Nam quod ad Christum attinet, Judaei qui sunt Christiani nominis hostes infestissimi, nec olim ausi sunt, nec etiamnum audent negare Christum patrasse miracula: sed nescio quid commenti sunt, ut eludant vim argumenti quod inde deducimus; nempe vel Christum illa fecisse arte magica, quam in Aegypto didicerat: vel virtute nominis illius tetragrammati, cujus rectam pronunciationem et expositionem tenebat. Fabulantur enim quicunque nomen illud scit recte pronunciare, posse vi illius nominis quavis opera miranda facere. Cujus commenti vanitas per se patet, nec opus est illud refutare. Solummodo hic notamus non parum inde confirmari veritatem miraculorum Christi: quandoquidem Judaei qui maxime ejus gloriae invident, non audent, neque possunt aperte negare illa facta fuisse. Et similiter Ethnicorum plurimi testimonium Mosi perhibuerunt, et veritatem agnoverunt historiae Mosaicae, ut videre est in libris Josephi contra Appionem, et Eusebii de praeparatione Evangelica.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.