They did not stumble into suffering by inadvertence; Moses refused dynastic gain and recorded his own faults
Nor can it be said that they fell into such hardships by thoughtlessness. For when they took up their office they foresaw these calamities, and voluntarily handed themselves over to be exercised and tormented by so many evils. Moses indeed was leader and priest of the Israelite people; yet how little he cared for himself and his own is plain from this: that he did not transmit the principate and the priesthood to his posterity, but designated his servant Joshua as leader of the people after him, and, at God's command, inaugurated his brother Aaron as priest.
And how far the sacred writers were from vain glory is plain from this: that if anything great or illustrious was done or said by them, they refer it wholly to God as received from Him; nay, in those very writings which they commend as divinely inspired they candidly note their own blemishes and defects; and if anything in them was slight and humble and without glory, they do not disguise it. Thus Moses recorded his own diffidence and the penalty of that diffidence which God imposed on him; and likewise his brother Aaron's idolatry and his sister Mary's murmurings.
Latin
XII. Nec dici potest eos per incogitantiam incidisse in tales aerumnas. Nam illi munus suum aggredientes praescii fuerunt harum calamitatum, et ultro sese exercendos et cruciandos tot malis tradiderunt. Moses quidem populi Israelitici dux fuit et sacerdos: sed tamen quam parum sibi suisque studuerit inde manifestum est, quod principatum et sacerdotium non transmisit ad posteros suos, sed servum suum Josuam ducem populi post se designavit, et fratrem suum Aaronem in sacerdotem, Deo mandante, inauguravit. Quam autem a vana gloria sacri scriptores alieni fuerint, inde patet, quod, si quid magnum aut praeclarum ab ipsis gestum vel dictum fuit, id totum Deo acceptum referunt: imo in illis ipsis scriptis, quae tanquam divinitus inspirata commendant, candide notant suos naevos atque defectus: Et si quid in ipsis tenue et humile ac inglorium fuit, istud non dissimulant. Ita Moses annotavit suam diffidentiam et diffidentiae poenam, quam Deus ipsi imposuit: itemque fratris sui Aaronis idololatriam et Mariae sororis murmura.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.