Scripture's evidence is not metaphysical demonstration; its light is moral evidence that induces the pious and prudent
The evidence that belongs to Scripture is not of the former kind. For that Scripture is divinely inspired is not a thing known of itself, as these principles are — The whole is greater than its part; The same thing cannot at once be and not be. Nor can that be demonstrated logically or mathematically, as experience shows. For no one has ever been able to bring any demonstration of this truth. Add that if the matter stood so, the assent we would give to sacred Scripture would be science, not faith, since the definition of science itself is that it is a demonstrative habit.
Therefore sacred Scripture has no other light or evidence besides that moral evidence we have named. For although it is not known of itself, nor can it properly be demonstrated, that sacred Scripture came forth from God, yet this is urged by so many and so probable arguments, and Scripture has in itself so many and so marked notes and indications of its divinity, that from them a pious and prudent man is effectively led to believe that it is true and divine.
Latin
IX. Evidentia, quae Scripturae competit, non est prioris generis. Etenim Scripturam esse divinitus inspiratam res non est per se nota, sicut haec principia, Totum est majus sua parte. Idem non potest simul esse et non esse. Nec etiam istud demonstrari potest logice, seu mathematice, ut patet experientia. Nec enim ullus unquam potuit hujus veritatis aliquam afferre demonstrationem. Adde quod, si res ita se haberet, assensus ille, quem sacrae Scripturae adhiberemus, scientia esset, non fides, siquidem ipsius scientiae definitio est, quod sit habitus demonstrativus. X. Igitur Scriptura sacra non habet aliam lucem, sive evidentiam, praeter illam quam moralem diximus. Etenim quamvis non sit per se notum, nec etiam possit proprie demonstrari Scripturam sacram a Deo prodiisse: attamen hoc tam multis, et tam probabilibus argumentis suadetur, habetque Scriptura in se tot et tam insignia divinitatis suae notas et indicia, ut inde vir pius et prudens efficaciter inducatur ut credat illam esse veram et divinam.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.