Suárez agrees contact-latria is speculative, not for common public use—prefer absolute inferior cult for her own holiness and maternity
Suárez too allows extrinsic contact-latria—Mary touched Christ and cooperated in redemption more than cross or nails.
Speculatively fine; publicly he bars common use lest divine excellence be ascribed, and lest inferior absolute cult for her own holiness and maternity be the greater honor.
Latin
XXXVIII. Cui doctrinae consentanea sunt quae leguntur apud Franciscum Suarez celeberrimum quoque Jesuitam. Inquirens enim ob quam potissimum rationem Beata Virgo sit adoranda, docet triplicem posse rationem adorationis in Virgine intelligi. Et primam rationem, propter quam Virgo potest adorari, dicit esse extrinsecam, qualis in cruce, vel clavis Christi reperitur. Sicut enim, inquit, crux, & Christum tetigit, & instrumentum fuit nostrae Redemptionis, ita multo perfectius Beatissima Virgo, & Christum tetigit, & ad nostram Redemptionem est cooperata. Hoc igitur modo adorabilis est Beata Virgo ratione extrinseca id est, quatenus Christum tetigit, ita ut tota ratio hujus adorationis sit Christus. Loquitur autem de adoratione Latriae, respective saltem & secundariae, quam hujusmodi ratio, juxta ipsum, exigit. Et propterea statim subjungit, Est tamen observandum, quanquam haec ratio speculative considerata sufficiens sit ut propterea Virgo sit adorabilis: practice tamen, seu in usu non esse hoc modo adorandam praesertim communi, ac publica Ecclesiae adoratione, non quia hoc sit intrinsece malum, nam revera non est. Nam si quis idoneus sit ad discernendas rationes adorationis, & cavendum omne periculum, & ad scandalum vitandum, nulla est in hujusmodi adoratione deordinatio, aut malitia. Qui tamen communem hujus adorationis usum vitandum esse dicit tum propter periculum ne quis Virgini divinam excellentiam tribuat: tum quod major est honor personae adoratae, quod propter intrinsecam & propriam excellentiam, absolute colatur adoratione quadam inferiori, quam si adoretur, Latria respectiva propter personae divinae contactum. Proinde vult ut Virgo communiter adoretur propter alias rationes, nempe tum propter intrinsecam sanctitatem quam habet, tum propter dignitatem matris Dei, quibus Respondet cultus Latria inferior, & a Latria distinctus. In tertiam partem Thomae quaest. 37. Art. 4. disput. 22. sect. 2.
About this text
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu, Sedan Theses, newly rendered from Latin: from theology proper through the Roman theses I–77 and the Reformed theses of Part Two. The theses only — not the collected works.
English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).
Catalogue & scope
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Theologia I-XLIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive PDF of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
- Checked print Internet Archive DjVu OCR of the 1675 Pitt folio (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Fide I-XXII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Authoritate Scripturae Pars I I-XLVII + Pars II I-XXXV + Pars III I-VIII (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, De Scripturae plenitudine densify (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.