To Florus 4.75
For if, with your faith entirely intact, you were attempting to shake what cannot be defeated merely to show the strength of your learning, in the manner of a school exercise, while intending to award the victory to those you opposed once the playful contest ended, I would approve your literary enthusiasm but rebuke your irreligious example. Instead, you follow with the ugliest stubbornness a doctrine that lacks even the false coloring of plausibility and that you cannot defend by any testimonies of the Law, since these never count against reason. It bristles with impiety and lies prostrate in foolishness, existing nowhere except amid the groins of human desires, pierced through by decency, argument, and sacred law. One of three conclusions therefore follows: either your understanding is leaden, or you suffer the chains of that sorcery we have heard is contained in the Manichaean mysteries, or both at once.
Latin
Si enim incolumissima fide, scholari more ad ostendendas tantummodo eruditionis tuae vires, ea tentares quae sunt invicta concutere; finito tamen certaminis ludicro, his quibus obloquebaris palmam daturus; probaremus litterarum studium, sed irreligiosum castigaremus exemplum. Porro cum dogma nec verisimilitudinis corrupto saltem colore perfusum, quod nullis legis testimoniis (quippe numquam rationi praeiudicantibus) potestis tueri, et hoc tamen impietate sua horrens, stultitia iacens, nusquam nisi inter inguina voluntatum, honestate, disputatione, sacraque lege confossum, turpissima obstinatione secteris; consequitur ex tribus unum, ut aut plumbei ad intellegendum acuminis, aut maleficii illius quod Manichaeorum mysteriis teneri, fando accepimus, catenas, aut utrumque simul perpeti iudiceris.