Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.
You have certainly done neither.After replying that catholics acknowledge free will—and pretending to be one of them—you immediately added a definition taking away what you seemed to have granted.For you say: ‘But anyone who says humans have free will to worship God rightly without his help is called a Pelagian.’ And again: ‘We say that humans have free will; but you say that anyone is free to do good’ (Augustine, Marriage and Sexual Desire 2.8).
Quorum certe nihil a te actum est; sed postquam respondisti catholicos liberum arbitrium confiteri, de quorum te numero esse confingis, statim definitionem admovisti, quae id, quod dedisse videbaris, eriperet. Ais enim: Sed si quis ad colendum recte Deum sine ipsius adiutorio dicit esse in hominibus liberum arbitrium, hic Pelagianus vocatur; et item: Liberum arbitrium esse in hominibus dicimus, liberum autem quemquam esse ad agendum bonum vos dicitis [n129] .