To Florus 2.103
‘And the gift,’ he says, ‘is not as it was through one who sinned. For the judgment was from one to condemnation, but grace is from many offenses to justification’ (Romans 5:16). You attach this explanation to the apostle’s words: ‘“From one”—from one what,’ you ask, ‘if not offense? For what follows is “But grace is from many offenses.” Let these people say how judgment comes from one offense to condemnation, unless even the single original sin that passed into all human beings is sufficient for condemnation. Grace, however, is from many offenses to justification because it releases not only that single sin inherited at birth, but also the other sins each person adds by the movement of his own will. “For if through one man’s offense death reigned through one, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and righteousness reign in life through the one Jesus Christ. Therefore, as through one man’s offense it came upon all human beings to condemnation, so through one man’s righteousness it came upon all human beings to justification of life”’ (Romans 5:17–18; Augustine, Marriage and Desire 2.46). After these apostolic words, as though you had achieved something, you insult us: ‘Let them persist in the vanity of their minds (Ephesians 4:17) and say that one man did not transmit sin by descent but supplied an example of it. How, then, does it come “through one man’s offense upon all human beings to condemnation,” rather than through each person’s many offenses, unless that one sin alone is sufficient to bring condemnation even when no other sins are added? It does so to dying infants born from Adam, unless they are reborn in Christ. Why, then, does this man ask us what he refuses to hear from the apostle: through what sin is found in an infant—whether through will, marriage, or parents? Let him hear through what. Let him hear and be silent: through what sin is found in an infant. The apostle says, “Through one man’s offense upon all human beings to condemnation”’ (Romans 5:18; Augustine, Marriage and Desire 2.46). We know that you fear nothing more than questioning that probes your mind and doctrine. That is why you use every resource to obtain from the powers of this world a refusal of examination. You understand that you must act by force when reason’s help deserts you.
Latin
Et non - inquit - sicut per unum peccantem ita est et donum; nam iudicium ex uno in condemnationem, gratia autem ex multis delictis in iustificationem [n139] . Quibus Apostoli verbis admoves expositionem tuam ita se habentem: " Ex uno " ergo quid - inquis - nisi delicto? Quia sequitur: " Gratia autem ex multis delictis ". Dicant isti, quomodo ex uno delicto in condemnationem, nisi quia sufficit ad condemnationem etiam unum originale peccatum, quod in omnes homines pertransiit; gratia vero ideo ex multis delictis in iustificationem, quia non solum unum illud solvit, quod originaliter trahitur, sed etiam cetera, quae in unoquoque homine motu propriae voluntatis adduntur. " Si enim ob unius delictum mors regnavit per unum, multo magis qui abundantiam gratiae et iustitiae accipiunt, in vita regnabunt per unum Iesum Christum. Itaque sicut per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem, ita et per unius iustitiam in omnes homines ad iustificationem vitae " [n140] . Post quae Apostoli verba, quasi aliquid confeceris, insultando de nobis loqueris: Adhuc permaneant in vanitate mentis suae et dicant unum hominem non propaginem traiecisse, sed exemplum praebuisse peccati. Quomodo ergo " per unius delictum in omnes homines ad condemnationem " et non potius per multa sua cuiusque delicta, nisi quia, etiamsi illud unum sit tantum, idoneum est perducere ad condemnationem etiam nullis additis ceteris, sicut perducit parvulos morientes, qui ex Adam nascuntur, si in Christo non renascantur? Quid ergo a nobis quaerit iste quod non vult ab Apostolo audire, per quid peccatum inveniatur in parvulo; utrum per voluntatem an per nuptias an per parentes? Ecce, audiat per quid, audiat et taceat, per quid peccatum inveniatur in parvulo. Apostolus: " Per unius delictum - inquit - in omnes homines ad condemnationem " [n141] . Nihil te quidem magis timere quam interrogationem perscrutatricem animi tui et dogmatis novimus; inde est quippe quod omnibus opibus negationem examinis a mundi potestatibus comparatis; intellegitis enim agendum vobis vi esse, cum deserimini rationis auxilio.
About this text
Julian’s six preserved books to Florus, quoted section by section in Augustine’s unfinished reply. Augustine’s refutations are omitted. Latin of Julian’s words is on each section.
Julian’s own books do not survive as a separate manuscript. English follows his words as Augustine quotes them in the Unfinished Work Against Julian. Augustine’s replies are omitted. We do not restore a Julian text independent of Augustine.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Augustine, Unfinished Work Against Julian (Latin · Julian’s words as quoted, Books 1–6)
- Checked print Augustinus.it Latin of the Unfinished Work (Latin · Same work)
- Checked print Migne PL 45 (Latin · Hard cases)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.