Solving pseudographic proofs; rule 2: where reason fails, faith's edifice begins
But the mode of solving pseudographic proofs is not one. For sometimes they are solved by applying a sound interpretation of the principles and showing the sinister application to the proposed question; sometimes by denial or even by opposing true principles from diverse Scripture places that agree best among themselves, and by showing the harmony and connection which, agreeably to the nature of the words and things signified, confirms the truer sentence and is destroyed and weakened by the weaker; sometimes by some limitation and distinction; sometimes even by deduction to absurdity, which rests on the negative principle of contradiction and has the greatest force for vigorously weakening such proofs and whatever conflicts with the articles of faith — as may be seen in 1 Corinthians 15, where the Apostle leads those denying the resurrection of the dead to as many absurdities as possible.
2. Where reason fails, there faith's edifice begins. Divine mysteries are not to be pried into, but to be wondered at. Hence St. Athanasius to Serapion: The knowledge of God, he says, is to be comprehended by faith, not sought out by human reason. Let faith preside; let reason sit under.
Latin
Modus vero solvendi probationes pseudographicas non est unus. Nam interdum solvuntur adhibita sana principiorum interpretatione & monstrata sinistra applicatione ad propositam quaestionem: interdum per inficiationem vel etiam per oppositionem verorum principiorum e diversis scripturae locis inter se optime consentientium & ostensionem harmoniae & synapheias connexionis, quae verborum rerumque significatarum naturae convenienter veriorem sententiam confirmat & a sequiore destruitur & labefactatur: interdum aliqua limitatione & distinctione: interdum vero etiam per deductionem ad absurdum, quae negativo contradictionis principio nititur, plurimumque valet ad nervose labefactandas ejusmodi probationes & quicquid articulis fidei repugnat, ut videre est 1. Cor. 15. ubi Apostolus negantes resurrectionem mortuorum ad absurda quam plurima deducit. 2. Ubi deficit ratio, ibi incipit fidei aedificatio. Divina mysteria non rimanda, sed miranda. Hinc S. Athanasius ad Serapionem: Dei, ait, cognitio fide comprehendenda, non ratione humana exquirenda. Fides praesit, ratio subsit.
About this text
Ludwig Crocius — Book IV Chapter 9 On the forensic law.
English follows the locked 1636 Bremen Latin of Liber I Cap. 10, reconstructed from SLUB Dresden page images. Same-page OCR (tesseract lat + Vision) used as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. 11 (CAPUT UNDECIMUM / De S. Theologiae distributione) begins. Cap. 9 complete. Liber I still open. No Internet Archive copy was located.
Catalogue & scope
VD17 14:684303C. SLUB id335860389. Liber I Cap. 10 De principio S.S. Theologiae a primo dependente.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Liber I Cap. 10 complete (Villerian 1636) (Latin)
- Checked print SLUB per-page OCR of Liber I Cap. 10 pages (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.