Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus 8
Why should I go on listing the countless names and genealogies of such figures? In every respect the writers, poets, and philosophers — and even those who follow them — are deceived. They have fabricated myths and sheer foolishness about the gods they describe, failing to prove those beings are divine; instead they portray them as mere humans, some drunkards, others fornicators and murderers.
They also speak discordantly and vilely about the origin of the world. First, some declared the world uncreated, as we have already shown. Those who claim it is uncreated and eternal by nature do not speak consistently with those who assert it was created; they rely on conjecture and human reasoning, not on truth. Others, on the other hand, maintain that providence exists and then analyze their own teachings. Aratus, for instance, says: “We begin with Zeus, whom men never leave unspoken; all streets, marketplaces, seas, and harbors are full of him, and we all need him, for we are his offspring. He is gentle to humanity, extending his right hand, rousing people to work and reminding them of their livelihood, telling when the soil is best for plowing and for sowing every seed.” So whom should we trust — Aratus or Sophocles, who declares, “There is no clear providence; it is best to live as one can”? Homer disagrees, saying, “Zeus gives virtue to men and increases it.” Simonides adds, “No one obtains virtue without the gods, neither city nor mortal.” God is all‑wise; nothing exists apart from him. Euripides echoes, “There is nothing without God for men.” Menander states, “No one cares for us except God alone.” Euripides again: “When it seems good to God, he saves, providing many pretexts for salvation.” And Thesius: “If God wills, you will be saved, even if you sail on a raft.” Yet having said all this, they contradict themselves. Sophocles, speaking of divine neglect, says, “No mortal can escape the blow of God.” Moreover they have introduced a multitude of deities or even a single monarchy, and those who affirm providence have simultaneously asserted its opposite, neglect. Consequently Euripides confesses, “We strive for many things in vain, enduring troubles while knowing nothing.” Reluctantly they admit they do not know the truth, for they have been inspired and possessed by demons, and they spoke through those spirits.
The poets Homer and Hesiod, as they claim, were inspired by the Muses, yet they spoke in fantasy and error, not by a pure spirit but by deception. From this it is clearly shown that even those who are possessed by demons are sometimes exorcised in the name of the true God, and the errant spirits themselves confess they are demons who were active in those individuals at that time. Nevertheless, at times certain people, awakened in their souls, have spoken in agreement with the prophets, so that they may serve as a testimony to the prophets and to all humanity concerning the monarchy of God, his judgment, and the other matters the prophets declared.
Greek
Καὶ τί μοι τὸ λοιπὸν τὸ πλῆθος τῶν τοιούτων ὀνομασιῶν καὶ γενεαλογιῶν καταλέγειν; Ὥστε κατὰ πάντα τρόπον ἐμπαίζονται οἱ συγγραφεῖς πάντες καὶ ποιηταὶ καὶ φιλόσοφοι λεγόμενοι, ἔτι μὴν καὶ οἱ προσέχοντες αὐτοῖς, Μύθους γὰρ μᾶλλον καὶ μωρίας συνέταξαν περὶ τῶν κατ᾿ αὐτοὺς θεῶν· οὐ γὰρ ἀπέδειξαν αὐτοὺς θεοὺς ἀλλὰ ἀνθρώπους, οὓς μὲν μεθύσους, ἑτέρους πόρνους καὶ φονεῖς. Ἀλλὰ καὶ περὶ τῆς κοσμογονίας ἀσύμφωνα ἀλλήλοις καὶ φαῦλα ἐξεῖπον. Πρῶτον μὲν ὅτι τινὲς ἀγένητον τὸν κόσμον ἀπεφήναντο, καθὼς καὶ ἔμπροσθεν ἐδηλώσαμεν. Καὶ οἱ μὲν ἀγένητον αὐτὸν καὶ ἀΐδιον φύσιν φάσκοντες οὐκ ἀκόλουθα εἶπον τοῖς γενητὸν αὐτὸν δογματίσασιν. Εἰκασμῷ γὰρ ταῦτα καὶ ἀνθρωπίνῃ ἐννοίᾳ ἐφθέγξαντο, καὶ οὐ κατὰ ἀλήθειαν. Ἕτεροι δ᾿ αὖ εἶπον πρόνοιαν εἶναι, καὶ τὰ τούτων δόγματα ἀνέλυσαν. Ἄρατος μὲν οὖν φησιν· Ἐκ Διὸς ἀρχώμεσθα, τὸν οὐδέποτ᾿ ἄνδρες ἐῶμεν Ἄῤῥητον· μεσταὶ δὲ Διὸς πᾶσαι μὲν ἀγυιαί, Πᾶσαι δ᾿ ἀνθρώπων ἀγοραί, μεστὴ δὲ θάλασσα Καὶ λιμένες· πάντη δὲ Διὸς κεχρήμεθα πάντες. Τοῦ γὰρ καὶ γένος ἐσμέν· ὁ δ᾿ ἤπιος ἀνθρώποισιν Δεξιὰ σημαίνει, λαοὺς δ᾿ ἐπὶ ἔργον ἐγείρει Μιμνήσκων βιότοιο· λέγει δ᾿ ὅτε βῶλος ἀρίστη Βουσί τε καὶ μακέλῃσι, λέγει δ᾿ ὅτε δεξιαὶ ὧραι Καὶ φυτὰ γυρῶσαι καὶ σπέρματα πάντα βαλέσθαι. Τίνι οὖν πιστεύσωμεν, πότερον Ἀράτῳ ἢ Σοφοκλεῖ λέγοντι Πρόνοια δ᾿ ἐστὶν οὐδενὸς [σαφής], Εἰκῆ κράτιστον ζῆν ὅπως δύναιτό τις; Ὅμηρος δὲ πάλιν τούτῳ οὐ συνᾴδει. Λέγει γάρ· Ζεὺς δ᾿ ἀρετὴν ἄνδρεσσιν ὀφέλλει τε μινύθει τε. Καὶ Σιμωνίδης· Οὔτις ἄνευ θεῶν Ἀρετὰν λάβεν, οὐ πόλις, οὐ βροτός. Θεὸς ὁ παμμῆτις· ἀπήμαντον δ᾿ οὐδὲν Ἔστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς. Ὁμοίως καὶ Εὐριπίδης· Οὐκ ἔστιν οὐδὲν χωρὶς ἀνθρώποις θεοῦ. Καὶ Μένανδρος· Οὐκ ἄρα φροντίζει τις ἡμῶν ἢ μόνος θεός. Καὶ πάλιν Εὐριπίδης· Σῶσαι γὰρ ὁπόταν τῷ θεῷ δοκῇ, Πολλὰς προφάσεις δίδωσιν εἰς σωτηρίαν. Καὶ [Θέστιος]· Θεοῦ θέλοντος σώζῃ, κἂν ἐπὶ ῥιπὸς πλέῃς. Καὶ τὰ τοιαῦτα μυρία εἰπόντες ἀσύμφωνα ἑαυτοῖς ἐξεῖπον. Ὁ γοῦν Σοφοκλῆς ἀπρονοησίαν ἐν ἑτέρῳ λέγων· Θεοῦ δὲ πληγὴν οὐχ ὑπερπηδᾷ βροτός. Πλὴν καὶ πληθὺν εἰσήγαγον ἢ καὶ μοναρχίαν εἷπον, καὶ πρόνοιαν εἶναι τοῖς λέγουσιν ἀπρονοησίαν τἀναντία εἰρήκασιν. Ὁθεν Εὐριπίδης ὁμολογεῖ λέγων· Σπουδάζομεν δὲ πολλ᾿ ὑπ᾿ ἐλπίδων, μάτην Πόνους ἔχοντες, οὐδὲν εἰδότες. Καὶ μὴ θέλοντες ὁμολογοῦσιν τὸ ἀληθὲς μὴ ἐπίστασθαι· ὑπὸ δαιμόνων δὲ ἐμπνευσθέντες καὶ ὑπ᾿ αὐτῶν φυσιωθέντες ἃ εἶπον δι᾿ αὐτῶν εἶπον. Ἤτοι γὰρ οἱ ποιηταί, Ὅμηρος δὴ καὶ Ἡσίοδος, ὥς φασιν ὑπὸ Μουσῶν ἐμπνευσθέντες, φαντασίᾳ καὶ πλάνῃ ἐλάλησαν, καὶ οὐ καθαρῷ πνεύματι ἀλλὰ πλάνῳ. Ἐκ τούτου δὲ σαφῶς δείκνυται, εἰ καὶ οἱ δαιμονῶντες ἐνίοτε καὶ μέχρι τοῦ δεῦρο ἐξορκίζονται κατὰ τοῦ ὀνόματος τοῦ ὄντως θεοῦ, καὶ ὁμολογεῖ αὐτὰ τὰ πλάνα πνεύματα εἶναι δαίμονες, οἱ καὶ τότε εἰς ἐκείνους ἐνεργήσαντες· πλὴν ἐνίοτέ τινες τῇ ψυχῇ ἐκνήψαντες ἐξ αὐτῶν εἶπον ἀκόλουθα τοῖς προφήταις, ὅπως εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς τε καὶ πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις, περί τε θεοῦ μοναρχίας καὶ κρίσεως καὶ τῶν λοιπῶν ὧν ἔφασαν.