Novatian, On the Trinity 10
I warn you: we are not to expect a different Christ in the gospel than this one whom the Creator promised beforehand in the letters of the Old Testament. The very things predicted about him have been fulfilled, and the things fulfilled were foretold in advance. Therefore I can truly and steadfastly say to these heretics who reject the authority of the Old Testament: "Who are you? Where are you from? By whom were you sent? Why did you want to come now? Why are you such a person? Or how could you come? Or why did you not go to your own people, unless you proved you have no people of your own by coming to strangers? What have you to do with the world of the Creator? What have you to do with the man of the Founder? What have you to do with the fabricated body, from which you strip away the hope of resurrection? Why do you come to a foreign servant and desire to seduce a foreign son? Why do you try to snatch me from the Lord? Why do you compel me to blaspheme and be impious toward the Father? What shall I gain from you in the resurrection, you who do not receive me yourself while I lose my body? If you wanted to save, you would have made a man to whom you could give salvation. If you desired to rescue from sin, you would have prevented me from sinning in the first place. What sanction of the law do you carry with you? What testimony of the prophetic voice do you have? Or what solid thing can I promise about you, since I see you coming as a phantom and not in solid reality? What then have you to do with the figure of a body, if you hate the body? You are defeated by bearing the very substance of the body you hated, whose mere likeness you also chose to take. You ought to have hated the imitation of the body if you hated the truth. For if you are someone else, you ought to have come in a different way, so that you would not be called the Son of the Creator, even if you had the image of flesh and body. Certainly, if you hated birth because you hated the union of the Creator's marriage, you ought to have refused even the imitation of man, who is born through the Creator's marriage." We therefore do not acknowledge the Christ of the heretics, who existed only in appearance and not in truth—since he did nothing true among the things he did, if he himself was a phantom and not the truth—nor the one who took nothing of our body into himself, because he received nothing from Mary, so that he did not come to us, since he did not appear in our substance; nor the one who, as other heretics claimed, put on heavenly or starry flesh. We see no salvation in him unless we also recognize the solid reality of our own body. Nor do we acknowledge any other whatsoever who bore some other body fabricated from the heretics' fictions. For both the birth of the Lord and his death itself refute all of them. For the Word, says John, became flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14); therefore our body was truly in him, because the Word took our flesh. And blood flowed from his hands and feet and his side precisely so that he might be proven a sharer in our body, while he died under the laws of our death. Having been raised in the very same bodily substance in which he died, he is confirmed by the wounds of his body, and in his flesh he also demonstrated the laws of our resurrection, because he restored in his resurrection the body he had taken from us. The law of resurrection is established in the fact that Christ was raised in bodily substance as the pattern for the rest. Since it is written that flesh and blood do not inherit the kingdom of God, the substance of the flesh is not condemned—it was fashioned by divine hands so that it would not perish—but only the guilt of the flesh is justly condemned, which, through the voluntary rashness of man, rebelled against the laws of the divine law. That guilt is removed in baptism and in the dissolution of death, and the flesh returns to salvation as it is recalled to the state of innocence, having laid aside the mortality of sin.
Latin
Sed illud admoneo, non alterum in euangelio Christum exspectandum fuisse, quam hunc a creatore ueteris testamenti litteris ante promissum; maxime cum et quae de ipso praedicta sunt impleta sint, et quae impleta sunt ante praedicta sint. ut merito haereticorum istorum testamenti ueteris auctoritatem respuentium nescio cui commenticio et ex fabulis anilibus ficto Christo atque fucato possim uere et constanter dicere: “quis es? unde es? a quo missus es? quare nunc uenire uoluisti? quare talis? uel qua uenire potuisti? uel quare non ad tuos abisti, nisi quod’ probasti tuos non habere, dum ad alienos uenis? quid tibi cum mundo creatoris? quid tibi cum homine conditoris? quid tibi cum figmento corporis, cui eripis spem resurrectionis? quid ad alienum uenis famulum, alienum sollicitare desideras filium? quid me a domino eripere conaris? quid me in patrem blasphemare atque impium esse compellis? aut quid sum a te in resurrectione consecuturus, qui me ipsum non recipio, dum corpus amitto? si saluare uis, fecisses hominem cui salutem dares. si a delicto eripere cupis, ante mihi ne delinquerem contulisses. quod autem tecum suffragium circumfers legis? quod habes testimonium propheticae uocis? aut quid mihi possum de te solidum repromittere, cum te uideam in phantasmate et non in soliditate uenisse? quid ergo tibi cum figura corporis, si corpus odisti? immo reuinceris corporis quod odisti circumferre substantiam, cuius suscipere uoluisti etiam figuram: odisse enim debueras corporis imitationem, si oderas ueritatem. quoniam si alter es, aliter uenire debueras, ne dicereris filius creatoris, si uel imaginem habuisses carnis et corporis. certe si oderas natiuitatem, quia creatoris oderas nuptiarum coniunctionem, recusare debueras etiam imitationem hominis, qui per nuptias nascitur creatoris.” neque igitur eum haereticorum agnoscimus Christum, qui in imagine (ut dicitur) fuit et non in ueritate:—nihil enim uerum eorum quae gessit fecerit, siipse phantasma et non ueritas fuit:— neque eum, qui nihil in se nostri corporis gessit, dum ex Maria nihil accepit, ne non nobis uenerit, dum non in nostra substantia uisus apparuit: neque illum, qui aetheream siue sideream, ut alii uoluerunt haeretici, induit carnem; nullam in illo nostro intellegamus salutem, si non etiam nostri corporis cognoscamus soliditatem: nec ullum omnino alterum, qui quoduis aliud ex figmento haereticorum gesserit corpus fabularum. omnes enim istos et natiuitas domini et mors ipsa confutat. nam et uerbum, inquit Ioannes, caro factum est, et habitauit in nobis; ut merito corpus nostrum in illo fuerit, quoniam quidem nostram carnem sermo suscepit. et sanguis idcirco de manibus ac pedibus atque ipso latere demanauit, ut nostri consors corporis probaretur, dum occasus nostri legibus moritur. qui dum in eadem substantia corporis, in qua moritur, resuscitatus ipsius corporis uulneribus comprobatur, etiam resurrectionis nostrae leges in sua carne monstrauit, qui corpus, quod ex nobis habuit, in sua resurrectione restituit. lex enim resurrectionis ponitur, dum Christus ad exemplum ceterorum in substantia corporis suscitatur. quoniam, cum caro ef sanguis non obtinere regnum dei scribitur, non carnis substantia damnata est, quae diuinis manibus, ne periret, exstructa est; sed sola carnis culpa merito reprehensa est, quae uoluntaria hominis temeritate contra legis diuinae iura grassata est. qua in baptismate et in mortis dissolutione sublata caro ad salutem reuertitur, dum ad statum innocentiae, deposita criminis mortalitate, reuocatur.