Lactantius — Divine Institutes 1.7

Lactantius · Divine Institutes · c. 310

For Apollo, whom they think more divine and prophetic than the rest, dwelling at Colophon—where I believe he had migrated from Delphi, drawn by Asia's pleasantness—answered someone asking who or what God altogether is in twenty-one verses, whose beginning is: self-grown, untaught, motherless, unshaken, a name not contained even by speech, dwelling in fire—this is God; but we angels are a small portion of God. Can anyone suspect this was said of Jupiter, who both had a mother and a name?

What of this—that the thrice-great Mercury, whom I mentioned above, calls God not only motherless as Apollo does, but also fatherless, because He has no origin from elsewhere? For He who Himself generated all things cannot have been generated by anyone. I have shown, I think, enough both by arguments and confirmed by witnesses what is clear enough of itself: that there is one king of the world, one father, one Lord.

But someone may ask of us the same thing Hortensius asks in Cicero: if God is one, what blessed solitude can there be?—as if, because we say one, we say He is deserted and solitary. For He has ministers whom we call messengers. And that is true which I reported above Seneca said in his Exhortations: that God generated ministers of His kingdom. But these are neither gods nor wish to be called or worshiped as gods, since they do nothing beyond God's command and will. Nor yet are they those who are commonly worshiped, whose number is both small and fixed.

But if the worshipers of the gods think they worship those very ones whom we call ministers of the highest God, there is nothing for which they should envy us who say one God and deny many. If multitude delights them, we do not say twelve or three hundred sixty-five as Orpheus, but that they are innumerable. We refute their errors in the opposite direction—those who think there are so few. Yet let them know by what name they ought to be called, lest they violate the true God, whose name they spread while assigning it to many. Let them believe their own Apollo, who in that same response as he took the principate from Jupiter, so also took the name of gods from the rest. For the third verse shows that God's ministers ought to be called not gods but angels.

About himself indeed that one lied, who, though of the number of demons, joined himself to God's angels; finally in other responses he confessed he is a demon. For when asked how he wished to be entreated, he answered thus: Hear, O all-wise, all-teaching, much-turning demon. Again when asked to produce a prayer to Smynthian Apollo, he began from this verse: Harmony of the world, light-bearer, all-wise demon. What then remains except that by his own confession he be subject to the whips of the true God and to everlasting punishment? For in another response he also said: Demons who roam about the earth and about the sea are subdued under the scourge of the tireless God.

We will treat of both kinds in the second book. Meanwhile it is enough for us that while he wished to honor himself and place himself in heaven, he confessed—what the matter holds—how those who always stand by God are to be named. Therefore let humans draw back from errors and, casting away crooked religions, recognize their parent and Lord, whose power cannot be estimated nor greatness perceived nor beginning grasped. When the intention and sharpness and memory of the human mind has reached Him, as if all paths were withdrawn and consumed, it stops, sticks, fails, and there is nothing further to which it can advance. But because it cannot be that what is began to be at some time—wait: rather, since it cannot be otherwise than that what exists began somehow—yet the consequence is that, since nothing was before Him, He Himself was brought forth before all things from Himself, and therefore is named by Apollo self-grown, by the Sibyl self-generated and unbegotten and unmade. Which Seneca, a sharp man, saw in his Exhortations: We, he says, hang from elsewhere. And so we look to someone to whom we owe what is best in us. Another brought us forth, another instructed us: God Himself made Himself.

Latin

Apollo enim, quem praeter ceteros diuinum maximeque fatidicum existimant, Colophone residens, quo Delphis credo migrauerat amoenitate Asiae ductus, quaerenti cuidam quis aut quid esset omnino deus, respondit uiginti et uno uersibus, quorum hoc principium est: αὺτοϕυὴς ἀδίδαϰτος ὰμήτωρ ἀστυϕέλιϰτος, οὔνομα μηδὲ λόγῳ χωρούμενός, ἐν πυρὶ ναίων, τοῦτο θεὸς, μικρὰ δὲ θεοῦ μερὶς ἄγγελοι ἥμεῖς, num quis potest suspicari de Ioue esse dictum, qui et matrem habuit et nomen? quid quod Mercurius ille Termaximus, cuius supra feci mentionem, non modo ἀμήτορα ut Apollo, sed ἀπάτορα quoque appellat deum, quod origo illi non sit aliunde? nec enim potest ab ullo esse generatus qui ipse uniuersa generauit. Satis ut opinor et argumentis docui et testibus confirmaui quod per se satis clarum est, unum esse regem mundi, unum patrem, unum dominum. sed orasse quaerat aliquis a nobis idem illut quod aput Ciceronem quaerit Hortensius, si deus unus est, quae esse beata solitudo queat. tamquam nos quia unum dicimus, desertum ac solitarium esse dicamus. habet enim ministros, quos uocamus nuntios. et est illut uerum quod dixisse in Exhortationibus Senecam supra rettuli, genuisse regni sui ministros deum. uerum hi neque dii sunt neque deos se uocari aut coli uolunt, quippe qui nihil faciant praeter iussum ac uoluntatem dei. nec tamen illi sunt qui uulgo coluntur, quorum et exiguus et certus est numerus. quodsi cultores deorum eos ipsos colere se putant, quos summi dei ministros appellamus, nihil est quod nobis faciant inuidiam, qui unum deum dicamus, multos negemus. si eos multitudo delectat, non duodecim dicimus aut trecentos sexaginta quinque ut Orpheus, sed innumerabiles esse. arguimus errores eorum in diuersum, qui tam paucos putant. sciant tamen quo nomine appellari debeant, ne uiolent uerum deum, cuius nomen exponunt, dum pluribus tribuunt. credant Apollini suo, qui eodem illo responso ut Ioui principatum, sic etiam ceteris diis abstulit nomen. tertius enim uersus ostendit ministros dei non deos, uerum angelos appellari oportere. de se quidem ille mentitus est, qui cum sit e numero daemonum, angelis se dei adgregauit: denique in aliis responsis daemonem se esse confessus est. nam cum interrogaretur quomodo sibi supplicari uellet, ita respondit: πάνσοφε παντοδίδακτε πολύστροφε κέκλυθι, δαῖμον . item rursus cum precem in Apollinem Sminthium rogatus expromeret, ab hoc uersu exorsus est: ἁρμονίη, ϰόσμοιο, ϕαεσϕόρε, πάνσοϕε δαῖμον . quid ergo superest nisi ut sua confessione uerberibus dei ueri ac poenae subiaceat sempiternae? nam et in alio responso ita dixit: δαίμονες οἳ ϕοιτῶσι περὶ χθόνα ϰαὶ περὶ πόντον ἀϰαμάτου δαμνῶνται ὑπαὶ μάστιγι θεοῖο . de utrisque generibus in secundo libro disseremus. nunc interim nobis satis est quod dum honorare se uult et in caelo conlocare, confessus est, id quod res habet, quomodo sint appellandi qui deo semper adsistunt. retrahant ergo se homines ab erroribus et abiectis religionibus prauis parentem suum dominumque cognoscant, cuius nec uirtus aestimari potest nec magnitudo perspici nec principium conprehendi. cum ad illum mentis humanae intentio et acumen et memoria peruenerit, quasi subductis et consumptis omnibus uiis subsistit haeret deficit nec est aliquid ulterius quo progredi possit. uerum quia fieri non potest quin id quod sit aliquando esse coeperit, consequens est ut quoniam nihil ante illum fuit, ipse ante omnia ex se ipso sit procreatus, ideoque ab Apolline αἀτο- ϕυής , a Sibylla αὺτογενής et ἀγένητος et ἀποίητος nominatur. quod Seneca homo acutus in Exhortationibus uidit. nos inquit aliunde pendemus. itaque ad aliquem respicimus, cui quod est optimum in nobis debeamus. alius nos edidit, alius instruxit: deus ipse se fecit..

← true-worship