Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History 5.17 (anonymous vs Montanist ecstasy)
…in which writing he shows that a prophet ought not to speak in ecstasy… Going further in the same place he lists those who have prophesied according to the New Covenant, among whom he numbers a certain Ammia and Quadratus, saying: But the false prophet is in a kind of ecstasy, which is followed by license and fearlessness — beginning from voluntary ignorance and ending in involuntary madness of soul, as was said before. In this manner they will be able to show neither any prophet of the Old nor of the New who was borne by the Spirit — neither Agabus nor Judas nor Silas nor the daughters of Philip, nor Ammia in Philadelphia nor Quadratus, nor if there are any others who do not belong to them…
Greek
ἐν ᾧ ἀποδείκνυσιν περὶ τοῦ μὴ δεῖν προφήτην ἐν ἐκστάσει λαλεῖν… ὑποκαταβὰς δ’ ἐν ταὐτῷ τοὺς κατὰ τὴν καινὴν διαθήκην προπεφητευκότας καταλέγει, ἐν οἷς καταριθμεῖ Ἀμμίαν τινὰ καὶ Κοδρᾶτον, λέγων οὕτως· ἀλλ’ ὅ γε ψευδοπροφήτης ἐν παρεκστάσει, ᾧ ἕπεται ἄδεια καὶ ἀφοβία, ἀρχομένου μὲν ἐξ ἑκουσίου ἀμαθίας, καταστρέφοντος δὲ εἰς ἀκούσιον μανίαν ψυχῆς, ὡς προείρηται. τοῦτον δὲ τὸν τρόπον οὔτε τινὰ τῶν κατὰ τὴν παλαιὰν οὔτε τῶν κατὰ τὴν καινὴν πνευματοφορηθέντα προφήτην δεῖξαι δυνήσονται, οὔτε Ἄγαβον οὔτε Ἰούδαν οὔτε Σίλαν οὔτε τὰς Φιλίππου θυγατέρας, οὔτε τὴν ἐν Φιλαδελφίᾳ Ἀμμίαν οὔτε Κοδρᾶτον, οὔτε εἴ δή τινας ἄλλους μηδὲν αὐτοῖς προσήκοντας…