Lactantius, Divine Institutes 8
The sheer number and authority of the witnesses confirm that the world is governed by the power and providence of one God. Plato declares in the *Timaeus* that this God's power and majesty are so vast that no one can grasp them with the mind or express them in words, because his power is excessive and beyond estimate. Should anyone still doubt whether anything is difficult or impossible for God, consider who he is: by providence he devised the world, by virtue he established it, by reason he perfected it, and now he sustains it by his Spirit, governs it by his power, and remains incomprehensible, ineffable, and known fully to no one but himself. Reflecting often on such majesty, I find that those who worship gods sometimes appear blind, thoughtless, foolish — hardly different from mute animals. They believe that beings born from the union of male and female can possess divine majesty and virtue, even though the Erythraean Sibyl says: "God cannot be formed from the thighs of a man and the womb of a woman." Since that is true, it follows that Hercules, Apollo, Liber, Mercury, and Jupiter himself — along with the rest — were merely human, because they were born of two sexes. What could be more alien to God than the very act he gave mortals for propagating offspring, an act that cannot exist without bodily substance? If the gods are immortal and eternal, what need have they for the other sex — namely, to generate? What need for progeny, since they lack nothing and will always exist? In humans and all other living creatures, the difference of sexes, intercourse, and birth serve no other purpose than to preserve each kind through mutual succession, because mortality condemns them to perish. But for God, who is eternal, neither a second sex nor succession is necessary. Someone may object that God needs a female sex in order to have ministers or subjects to rule. But if God is omnipotent, as he is called, he can beget sons without any use or work of a woman. He granted certain tiny creatures the power to be born from leaves and sweet herbs and to gather them with their mouths; why should anyone think God himself cannot generate except by the mixture of the other sex? Therefore, no one is so thoughtless as to miss the point: those whom the ignorant and foolish call and worship as gods were mortals. "How then," one asks, "did they come to be believed as gods?" Because they were the greatest and most powerful kings. On account of the merits of their virtues, their benefactions, or the arts they discovered, they were dear to those they ruled, and so they were consecrated to memory. If anyone doubts this, let him examine their deeds and actions, which both ancient poets and historians have handed down.
Latin
His igitur tot ac tantis testibus conprobatur unius dei potestate ac prouidentia mundum gubernari, cuius uim maiestatemque tantam esse dicit in Timaeo Plato, ut eam neque mente concipere neque uerbis enarrare quisquam possit ob) nimiam et inaestimabilem potestatem. dubitet uero aliquis an quicquam difficile aut inpossibile sit deo, qui tanta tamque mirifica opera prouidentia excogitauit, uirtute constituit, ratione perfecit, nunc autem spiritu sustentet, potestate moderetur, inexcogitabilis ineffabilis et nulli alii satis notus quam sibi? unde mihi de tanta maiestate saepius cogitanti qui deos colunt interdum uideri solent tam caeci, tam incogitabiles, tam excordes, tam non multum a mutis animalibus differentes, qui credant eos qui geniti sint maris ac feminae coitu aliquid maiestatis diuinaeque uirtutis habere potuisse, cum Sibylla Erythraea dicat: ou οὐ δύνατ\' ἀνδρὸς ἑϰ μηρῶν μήτρας τε θεὸς τετυπωμένος εἶναι. quod si est uerum, sicuti est, apparet Herculem Apollinem Liberum Mercurium Iouemque ipsum cum ceteris homines fuisse, quoniam sunt ex duobus sexibus nati. quid est autem a deo tam remotum quam id opus, quod ipse ad propagandam subolem mortalibus tribuit et quod sine substantia corporali nullum potest esse? dii ergo si sunt inmortales et aeterni, quid opus est altero sexu — nimirum ut generent? ipsa progenie quid opus est, cum successione non egeant qui semper sunt futuri? nam profecto in hominibus ceterisque animantibus diuersitas sexus et coitio et generatio nullam habet aliam rationem nisi ut omnia genera uiuentium, quoniam sunt condicione mortalitatis obitura, mutua possint successione seruari, deo autem, qui est sempiternus, neque alter sexus neque successio necessaria est. dicet aliquis ut habeat uel ministros uel in quos possit ipse dominari.\' quid igitur sexu opus est feminino, cum deus, qui est omnipotens ut uocatur, sine usu et opera feminae possit. filios procreare? nam si quibusdam minutis animalibus id praestitit, ut sibi e foliis natos et suauibus herbis ore legant, cur existimet aliquis ipsum deum nisi ex permixtione sexus alterius non posse generare? illos igitur quos inperiti et insipientes tamquam deos et nuncupant et adorant, nemo est tam inconsideratus quin intellegat fuisse mortales. \'quomodo ergo\' inquiet aliquis \'dii crediti sunt?\' nimirum quia reges maximi ac potentissimi fuerunt, ob merita uirtutum suarum aut munerum aut artium repertarum, cum cari fuissent iis quibus inperitauerant, in memoriam sunt consecrati. quod si quis dubitat, res eorum gestas et facta consideret, quae uniuersa tam poetae quam historici ueteres prodiderunt.